While I don't have any insight (or experience), I would posit that HTML in email is a Bad Thing(tm) generally anyways. Plain text is more efficient and guarantees no usability/viewability problems.
That aside, I would be interested in knowing more about this problem (and any resolution)
Most modern EMail clients handle this in a "smart" way, either through old-school quotation (eg > , >> , >>> , etc) or through silent markup.
A test you may want to try:
Send yourself an email to be retrieved via Entourage, reply in body (I recommend line breaks just for readability), view response on client end. Does it italicize or otherwise mark up your response?
Again though, this goes back to the Bad Thing (tm). See, you have no way of knowing that the recipient will be able to properly view your formatting. For example, I choose to receive all email in Plain Text. So I would see your response with no differentiation.
Just an observation.
No clue, but another thing I would be interested in knowing about.
Good Luck, and Welcome!


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote


Bookmarks